BUS 206 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric.
OverviewBusiness law impacts our everyday lives, both personally and professionally. Businesses enter contracts, manufacture goods, sell services and products, andengage in employment and labor practices—activities that must all adhere to certain laws and regulations. Recognizing and evaluating legal issues is afundamental skill that will help you navigate commercial relationships and avoid potential problems in the business world.The final assessment for this course will require you to analyze three case studies and produce a short report for each. You will apply your legal knowledge andyour understanding of the types of business organizations. The project is divided into three milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout thecourse to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Three, Five, and Six. The final project will besubmitted in Module Seven.This assessment addresses the following course outcomes:????Apply appropriate elements of the U.S. legal system and the U.S. Constitution to business scenarios for impacting decisions in authentic situationsApply concepts of ethics, morality, and civil and criminal law to business scenarios for informed corporate decision makingAnalyze the basic elements of a contract and a quasi-contract for their application to commercial and real estate scenariosDifferentiate between the various types of business organizations for informing rights and responsibilitiesPromptImagine yourself as a paralegal working in a law office that has been tasked with reviewing three current cases. You will review the case studies and compose ashort report for each, applying your legal knowledge and understanding of the types of business organizations. In each of the three reports, you will focus onareas of law covered in this course. Case Study One focuses on the legal system, criminal law, and ethics. Case Study Two concentrates on contracts and landlordtenant
law. Case Study Three involves environmental law and business organizations.Case Study OneChris, Matt, and Ian, who live in California, have decided to start a business selling an aftershave lotion called Funny Face over the internet. They contract withNovelty Now Inc., a company based in Florida, to manufacture and distribute the product. Chris frequently meets with a representative from Novelty Now todesign the product and to plan marketing and distribution strategies. In fact, to increase the profit margin, Chris directs Novelty Now to substitute PYR (a lowcost
chemical emulsifier) for the compound in Novelty Now’s original formula. PYR is not FDA approved. Funny Face is marketed nationally on the radio and innewspapers, as well as on the web and Facebook. Donald Margolin, a successful CEO and public speaker, buys one bottle of Funny Face over the internet. Afterhe uses it once, his face turns a permanent shade of blue. Donald Margolin and his company, Donald Margolin Empire Inc., file suit in the state of New Yorkagainst Novelty Now Inc. and Chris, Matt, and Ian, alleging negligence and seeking medical costs and compensation for the damage to his face and businessreputation. It is discovered that PYR caused Margolin’s skin discoloration. The website for Funny Face states that anyone buying their product cannot take Chris,Matt, and Ian to court. Novelty Now’s contract with the three men states that all disputes must be brought in the state of Florida.Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:A. Apply the rules of jurisdiction to the facts of this case and determine what jurisdiction(s) would be appropriate for Margolin’s lawsuit against Funny Faceand Novelty Now, respectively. Consider federal court, state court, and long arm principles in your analysis.B. Assume all parties agree to pursue alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of two types of ADR appropriate forthis case. Be sure to define the characteristics of each in your answer.C. Applying what you have learned about ADR, which type would each party (Funny Face, Novelty Now, and Margolin) prefer and why?D. Apply concepts of criminal law and discuss whether or not corporations and/or corporate officers may be held liable for criminal acts.E. Identify, per the classification of crimes in the text, any potential criminal acts by Funny Face and/or Novelty Now.F. Assume the use of the emulsifier PYR, at the direction of Chris, is a criminal offense. Apply concepts of criminal law and discuss the potential criminalliability of Funny Face, Chris, Matt, Ian, and Novelty Now. Include support for your conclusion.G. Use the WPH process of ethical decision making to evaluate any ethical issues within the case study.Case Study TwoSam Stevens lives in an apartment building where he has been working on his new invention, a machine that plays the sound of a barking dog to scare offpotential intruders. A national chain store that sells safety products wants to sell Sam’s product exclusively. Although Sam and the chain store never signed acontract, Sam verbally told a store manager several months ago that he would ship 1,000 units.Sam comes home from work one day and finds two letters in his mailbox. One is an eviction notice from his landlord, Quinn, telling him he has to be out of theapartment in 30 days because his barking device has been bothering the other tenants. It also states that Sam was not allowed to conduct a business from hisapartment. Sam is angry because he specifically told Quinn that he was working on a new invention, and Quinn had wished him luck. The second letter is fromthe chain store, demanding that Sam deliver the promised 1,000 units immediately.Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:A. Analyze the elements of this case to determine whether a valid contract exists between Sam and the chain store. Support your response by identifyingthe elements of a valid contract in your analysis.B. Assume there is not a valid contract between Sam and the chain store. Analyze the elements of a quasi-contract and a promissory estoppel to determinewhether the chain store would prevail on a claim of either. Why or why not? Include support for your analysis.C. Identify the rights and obligations of both the landlord and tenant under a standard residential lease agreement.D. Based upon those rights and obligations, does Sam’s landlord have grounds to evict? Why or why not?E. Further, what defenses might Sam raise to an eviction action? Support your response.Case Study ThreeJeb and Josh are lifelong friends. Jeb is a wealthy wind-power tycoon, and Josh is an active outdoor enthusiast. They have decided to open a sporting goodsstore, Arcadia Sports, using Jeb’s considerable financial resources and Josh’s extensive knowledge of all things outdoors. In addition to selling sporting goods, thestore will provide whitewater rafting, rock-climbing, and camping excursions. Jeb will not participate in the day-to-day operations of the store or in theexcursions. Both Jeb and Josh have agreed to split the profits down the middle. On the first whitewater rafting excursion, a customer named Jane falls off theraft and suffers a severe concussion and permanent damage to her spine. Meanwhile, Jeb’s wind farms are shut down by government regulators, and he goesbankrupt, leaving extensive personal creditors looking to collect.Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:A. Identify the main types of business entities and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each.B. Recommend a specific business entity for Arcadia Sports and include your reasoning.C. Based on the characteristics of each type of business entity, determine the type under which Jeb and Josh would be personally liable to Jane fordamages.D. Based on each type of business entity, analyze the ability of Jeb’s personal creditors to seize the assets and/or profits of Arcadia Sports.MilestonesMilestone One: Case Study OneIn Module Three, you will submit the first milestone. For this milestone, you will review Case Study One and compose a short report, applying your legalknowledge and understanding of the types of business organizations. Case Study One focuses on the legal system, criminal law, and ethics. This milestone will begraded with the Milestone One Rubric.Milestone Two: Case Study TwoIn Module Five, you will submit the second milestone. For this milestone, you will review Case Study Two and compose a short report, applying your legalknowledge and understanding of the types of business organizations. Case Study Two concentrates on contracts and landlord-tenant law. This milestone will begraded with the Milestone Two Rubric.Milestone Three: Case Study Three DiscussionIn Module Six, you will submit the third milestone. This milestone is a discussion regarding business entities and their advantages and disadvantages. Your activeparticipation in this discussion forum is essential to improving your understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of the various business entities. Activelyengaging with your peers will help you complete the remaining critical elements in the third case study for your final submission. This milestone will be gradedwith the Milestone Three Rubric.Final Project Submission: Case Study AnalysesIn Module Seven, you will submit your final project. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It shouldreflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric.Final Project RubricGuidelines for Submission: Each of the three reports should be one to two pages in length. The documents should use double spacing, 12-point Times NewRoman font, and one-inch margins. Citations must be given in APA format.